Researching Contested Companionship

Responsibility and Care Work in the Field

Authors

  • Stephanie Rose Eccles Concordia University

Keywords:

Animal geography, breed specific legislation, care ethics, multispecies research, panic policies

Abstract

June 8th, 2016 ended the lives of both Christiane Vadnais and Lucifer, but it also unraveled many other relations between humans and pitbull-type dogs. In this paper, I explore what it meant to conduct multispecies ethnography in the context of Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) in the city of Montréal between 2016-2018. I detail how methodologies of participant observation, walking interviews, and auto-ethnography explored themes of care, ethics, solidarity, and intervention. In the first section, I describe who I am engaging with when I say ‘pitbull-type dog’. It is here I define what I call contested companionship. Next, I turn to my fieldwork detailing three research methods. I first describe participant observation and rapport building at Tails and Paws Montréal, a dog care facility, and introduce Rocky, a pitbull-type dog that had to evacuate the province of Québec. Next, I outline the benefit of walking interviews for multispecies research. I conclude my reflection on methodological practices by drawing from auto-ethnographic data outlining my shared life with Clementine and Eleanor. In the third section, I consider questions of intervention in the field that were deeply tethered to matters of life and death for both human and nonhuman participants, in particular for Fred and his companions Marilyn and Samson. Scaffolded together, I provide an example of what an ethically informed multispecies research design looked like that additionally had to navigate contested companionship –illegal or precarious—that shaped methodological practices into politically productive strategies that safeguarded not only individuals but relationships.

References

Ahmed, Sara. 2015. The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Bernstien, Jaela. October 3, 2016. Montréal's new pit bull bylaw suspended until Wednesday. CBC News.
Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/montreal-pit bull-ban-spca-court-1.3788730

Bisgould, Lesli. 2010. Animals and the law. Toronto: Irwin Law Inc.

Boisseron, Bénédicte. 2015. Afro-dog. Transition 118, 15-31.

Braverman, Iris. 2013. Animal mobilegalities: The regulation of animal movement in the American city. Humanimalia 5(1), 104-135.

Buller, Henry. 2015. Animal geographies II: Methods. Progress in Human Geography 39(3), 374-84.

Bulsara, Max., Wood, Lisa, Giles-Corti, Billie and Darchy, Bosch. 2007. More than a furry companion: The ripple effect of companion animals on neighborhood interactions and sense of community. Society and Animals 15(1), 43-56.

CBC. 2017, October 3. Sister of woman killed in a dog attack ‘shocked’ by coroner’s report. CBC News. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/Montréal/Montréal-pit-bull-attack-1.4318358

CBC. 2016, September 27. How did your councilor vote on Montreal’s controversial pit bill bylaw? CBC News. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/pitbull-bylaw-vote-breakdown-1.3781452

Chang, Darren. 2017. Resisting speciesist segregation: Integration, separation, and infiltration with farmed animals. MA paper, Queen’s University.

Collard, Rosemary-Claire. 2015. Ethics in research beyond the human. In Tom Perreault, Gavin Bridge, James McCarthy (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. New York: Routledge, pp.127-139.

Collier, Stephen. 2006. Breed-specific legislation and the pit bull. Are the laws justified? Journal of Veterinary Behavior (1)1, 17-22.

Corman, Lauren and Vandrovcová, Tereza. 2014. Radical humility: Toward a more holistic critical animal studies pedagogy. In Anthony Nocella, John Sorenson, Kim Socha, and Atsuko Matsuoka (eds.), Defining Critical Animal Studies: An Intersectional Social Justice Approach for Liberation. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 135-157.

Cronin, G. M., Hemsworth, P. H., Barnett, J. L., Jongman, E. C., Newman, E. A., and McCauley, I. 2003. An anti-barking muzzle for dogs and its short-term effects on behaviour and saliva cortisol concentrations. Official Journal of the International Society for Applied Ethology 83(3), 215-226.

Dayan, Colin. 2011. The law is a white dog: How legal rituals make and unmake persons. Oxford: Princeton University Press

Delise, Karen. 2007. The pit bull placebo: The media, myths, and politics of canine aggression. Anubis Publishing: Ramsey.

Dickey, Bronwen. 2016. Pit bull: The battle over an American icon. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Dog Owner’s Liability Act (DOLA). R. S. O, 1990, c. 2. 16.

Dowling, Robyn, Llyod, Kate, and Suchet-Pearson, Sandra. 2016. Qualitative methods II: ‘more-than-human’ methodologies and/in praxis. Progress in Human Geography 1-9.

Eccles, Stephanie. 2018. The precarity of pitbull-type dog life: A case study of contested companionship in Montréal, Québec. MSc thesis, Concordia University.

Evans, James and Jones, Phil. 2011. The walking interview: Methodology, mobility, and place. Applied Geography 31(2),
849-858.

García, María Elena. 2020. Grieving guinea pigs: Reflections on research and shame. In Kathryn Gillespie and Patricia J. Lopez (eds.), Vulnerable Witness: The Politics of Grief in the Field. Oakland: University of California Press, pp. 40-53.

Gillespie, Kathryn. 2019. For a politicized multispecies ethnography: Reflections on a feminist geographic pedagogical experiment. Politics and Animals 5, 1-16.

Gillespie, Kathryn. 2017. Intimacy, animal emotion and empathy: Multispecies intimacy as slow research practice. In, Pamela Moss and Courtney Donovan (eds.), Writing Intimacy into Feminist Geography. New York: Routledge, pp. 160-170.

Gillespie, Kathryn. 2016. Nonhuman animal resistance the improprieties of live property. In, Irus Braverman (ed.), Animals, Biopolitics, Law: Lively Legalities. New York: Routledge, pp. 117-134.

Gillespie, Kathryn, and Lawson, Victoria. 2017. ‘My dog is my home’: Multispecies care and poverty in Los Angeles, California and Austin, Texas. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 24(6), 774-793.

Goss, Sarah. 2015. Both ends of the leash: Pit bull ownership and activism in Atlanta, Georgia. (Master’s Thesis). Available from ScholarWorks@ Georgia State University.

Govindrajan, Radhika. 2018. Animal intimacies: Interspecies relatedness in India’s Central Himalayas. London: The University of Chicago Press.

Gruen, Lori. 2015. Entangled empathy: An alternative for our relations with animals. New York: Lantern Books.

Hallsworth, Simon. 2011. Then they came for the dogs! Crime, Law and Social Change 55(5), 391-403.

Hobson, Kersty. 2007. Political animals? On animals as subjects in an enlarged political geography. Political Geography 26(3), 250-267.

Horowitz, Alexandra. 2016. Being a dog: Following the dog into a world of smell. New York: Scribner. 2009. Inside of a Dog: What Dogs See, Smell, and Know. New York: Scribner.

Hovorka, Alice. 2018. Animal geographies II: Hybridizing. Progress in Human Geography 42(3), 453-462.

Huff, Cynthia. 2014. Framing canine memoirs. a/b: auto/biography studies 29(1), 127-148.

Hunter, Susan, and Brisban, Richard. 2016. Making pet policy, Breed Specific Laws. In, Susan Hunter and Richard Brisban (eds.), Pet Politics: The Political and Legal Lives of Cats, Dogs, and Horses in Canada and the United States. Indiana: Purdue University, pp. 313-51.

Kirksey, Eben and Helmreich, Stefan. 2010. The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology 25(4), 545-76.

Kim, Claire-Jean. 2015. Dangerous crossings: Race, species, and nature in a multicultural age. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lichtblau, Ethan. 2017. Rapport d’Investigation du coroner: Loi sur la recherche des causes et des circonstances des décès. Beureau Du Coroner Québec. Retrieved from https://www.spca.com/wordpspca/wpcontent/uploads/2017/10/Rapportcoroner. Pdf

Lie, Martine Synnøve Bergersen. 2017. Stepdogs of society: The impact of breed bans in Norway. Critical Criminology 25, 293-309.

Meijer, Eva. 2019. When animals speak: Toward and interspecies democracy. New York: New York University Press.

McCarthy, Daniel. 2016. Dangerous dogs, dangerous owners and the waste management of an ‘irredeemable species’. Sociology 50(3), 560-575.

Milligan, Tony. 2017. The ethics of animal training. In Christine Overall (ed.), Pets and People: The Ethics of our Relationships with Companion Animals. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 203-217.

Montgomery, Angelica. (2018, March 19). Another fight brews over tougher, Québec-wide pitbull ban. CBC. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/breed-specific-legislation-rottweiler-national-assembly-bill-128-1.4579957

Nast, Heidi. 2018. For the love of life: Coal mining and pit bulls fighting in early 19th - century Britain. In S. Wilcox and S. Rutherford (eds.), Historical Animal Geographies (n.p). London: Routledge. Retrieved from Vital Source Online Database.

Nast, Heidi. 2015. Pit bulls, slavery, and whiteness in the Mid- to Late- Nineteenth-century US: Geographical trajectories; primary sources. In Rosemary-Claire Collard and Kathryn Gillespie (eds.), Critical Animal Geographies: Politics, Intersections, and Hierarchies in a Multispecies World. London: Routledge, pp. 127-146.

Nast, Heidi. 2014. Why dogs fight: History of dog fighting. Youtube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbQlaQ6V3i4

Olivier, Annabelle. March 31, 2017. Montreal pit bull ban: Registration deadline is Friday. Global News. Retrieved from https://globalnews.ca/news/3347873/montreal-pit-bull-ban-registration-deadline-is-friday/

Pachirat, Timothy. 2018. Sanctuary. In Lori Gruen (ed). Critical Terms for Animal Studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 335-355.

PetSmart. 2021. Requirements. Retrieved from https://services.petsmart.ca/content/daycamp-requirements.

Porteous, Douglas, J. 1985. Smellscape. Progress in Geography 9(3), 356-378.

Potts, Karen and Brown, Leslie. 2015. Becoming an anti-oppressive researcher. In Susan. Strega and Leslie Brown (eds.), Research as Resistance: Revisiting Critical, Indigenous, and Anti-oppressive Approaches (2nd Ed.). Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press, pp. 17-41.

Radin, Margaret Jane. 1996. Contested commodities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Sanders, Clinton 1998. Animal passions: The emotional experience of doing ethnography in animal-human interaction settings. In Scott Grills (ed.), Doing Ethnographic Research. California: Thousand Oaks, pp. 194-198.

Smuts, Barbara. 2006. Between species: Science and subjectivity. Configurations 14, 115- 126.

Spry, Tami. 2001. Performing auto-ethnography: An embodied methodological praxis. Qualitative Inquiry 7(6), 706-732.

Van Patter, Lauren. E. and Blattner, Charlotte. 2020. Advancing ethical principles for non-invasive, respectful research with animal participants. Society & Animals 28(2), 171-190.

Ville de Montréal, By-law No. 16-060, By-law Concerning Animal Control.

Weaver, Harlan. 2015. Pit bull promises: Inhuman intimacies and queer kinships in animal shelter. A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 21(2-3), 343-363.

Weaver, Harlan. 2013. Becoming in kind: Race, class, gender and nation in cultures of dog rescue and dogfighting. American Quarterly 65(3), 639-709.

Zinda, Elizabeth Selena. 2014. American cerberus: Meditations on pit bulls and the underworld. Depth Insights 6, 51-55.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-23

How to Cite

Eccles, S. R. (2022). Researching Contested Companionship: Responsibility and Care Work in the Field. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 21(2), 130–146. Retrieved from https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/2041